An interesting article on @BBC_Future about how silence following on from loud noise appears more silent than silence heard after something quiet. I have been to many silent places (anechoic chamber, flotation tank, deserts) where there is no external sound and what you hear is internal sounds, noteably high pitched sounds which are probably spontaneous firings of the auditory nerve. Are these firings louder in silence following loud noise than silence following quiet? I don’t know, but they do change overtime (provided you don’t suffer from tinnitus) as the brain adapts to completely silent conditions. I remember hearing them disappearing. More evidence of the adaptation that @tomstafford writes about.
- AI must learn from voice science
- Did acoustics affect where palaeolithic cave ‘art’ was painted?
- Schroeder diffuser using a metasurface: new idea?
- Scientists are trying to uncover what makes Stradivarius violins special – but are they wasting their time?
- Playing the Echo
- 360 Video of Reverberation Chamber
- Adding spatial audio to Ricoh Theta 360 Video
- Highway to hearing hell: musicians and the danger of deafness
- Should London’s new concert hall be a shoe-box?
- The science of scary screams
- Giant cornstarch monsters using paddling pool and shaker
- Data from deTune Battle
- The funniest whoopee cushion sound
- What is wrong with London’s concert halls
- Inner Jukebox
- Musical Fast
- All about what bass?
- The Shape of the Philharmonie de Paris
- Headphones: hearing things outside your head
- Strange Warblings in a Train Booking Hall
- Extreme acoustics in the Emanuel Vigeland mausoleum
- Hug by Verity Standen – review
- Acoustic analysis of playing the World’s ‘longest echo’
- Playing the World’s ‘longest echo’
- Can a computer hear when you’re drunk?
- Heroines of Acoustics
- Can computers compose?
- Air beds enhance Eurovision lyrics
- The myth of the stradviarius
- I am sitting in a room